<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prop 8 Decision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tumbler.jestertunes.com/2009/prop-8-decision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tumbler.jestertunes.com/2009/prop-8-decision/</link>
	<description>The Tumble Companion Site for Jestertunes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 15:16:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerald Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://tumbler.jestertunes.com/2009/prop-8-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerald Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 06:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tumbler.jestertunes.com/?p=48#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Hey Jester!

I am still rejoicing over the news that we won where prop 8 is concerned!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jester!</p>
<p>I am still rejoicing over the news that we won where prop 8 is concerned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerald Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://tumbler.jestertunes.com/2009/prop-8-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerald Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 05:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tumbler.jestertunes.com/?p=48#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Jester, from all accounts, the prop 8 will be upheld without a doubt as it is legal. Therefore, you guys might be in for a long day. The people have voted twice now, and the Court cannot override the will of the people. I do think however that they might let the previous &quot;marriages&quot; stand simply out of sympathy. But that will still be wierd since the wording is: &quot;Only marriage between a man and a woman &quot;IS&quot; recognized in California&quot;. So my prediction is: you lose on the most important one and perhaps win on the previous unions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jester, from all accounts, the prop 8 will be upheld without a doubt as it is legal. Therefore, you guys might be in for a long day. The people have voted twice now, and the Court cannot override the will of the people. I do think however that they might let the previous &#8220;marriages&#8221; stand simply out of sympathy. But that will still be wierd since the wording is: &#8220;Only marriage between a man and a woman &#8220;IS&#8221; recognized in California&#8221;. So my prediction is: you lose on the most important one and perhaps win on the previous unions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

